Good news: Alcohol has zero health benefits

I read this with great interest on the NPR app on my phone this morning: http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/03/22/471416356/that-cabernet-might-not-be-good-for-your-health-after-all. I’m a pretty big fan of empirical research, so if well-designed scientific studies show that there is or is not a health benefit or damage associated with some substance, I’ll listen. [Insert long-winded complaint about too many study designs and not-always-stellar science reporting.] And, if those conclusions are that alcohol has some health benefit, well, okay.

But for the sake of not triggering that clever addict inside a few million of us, it sure would be nice if there were no medical rationale[ization] for alcohol. Up to now, according to this article, research seemed to show that “moderate” drinkers were slightly healthier than heavy drinkers and also than nondrinkers. Even though every discussion of this that I saw included something like “but Dr. Iknowaboutthis said that these findings did not mean that if you don’t drink it’s a reason to start, especially for people with a problematic relationship to alcohol,” it was still perfect fodder for the addict looking for a reason why it’s a good idea to have a drink. The “not” could pretty easily — oops — get overlooked.

No more! Researchers at Boston Medical Center recrunched the numbers from 87 of the best studies on the effect of alcohol on death and found that the moderate drinkers’ better health was because they were healthier anyway: “moderate drinkers tend to be very socially advantaged.” Once the researchers controlled for socioeconomic class and separated out people who might have become nondrinkers because they had health problems (making nondrinkers as a group look less healthy), the appearance of better health for moderate drinkers went away. Evaporated. Reduced to zero. Approximately zilch. There’s nothing anybody’s addict can cling to on this one now. (The relative health of heavy drinkers in the number recrunching remained the same, at “much worse.”)

Everyone who reaches for the red wine on the logic that it is good for their health has to look just a little bit farther now. All those individual moments of one less easy excuse might just add up to something.

Have a good one.

Adrian

 

2 thoughts on “Good news: Alcohol has zero health benefits

    • You are kidding me. This society is heading toward a serious, sanctioned drinking problem, especially 30-, 40-, 50-something women. I’m so glad I got that out of the way early!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s